# Optical theorem

Optical theorem In physics, the optical theorem is a general law of wave scattering theory, which relates the forward scattering amplitude to the total cross section of the scatterer.[1] It is usually written in the form {Anzeigestil Sigma _{Mathrm {tot} }={frac {4Pi }{k}}~mathrm {Ich bin} ,f(0),} where f(0) is the scattering amplitude with an angle of zero, that is the amplitude of the wave scattered to the center of a distant screen and k is the wave vector in the incident direction.

Because the optical theorem is derived using only conservation of energy, or in quantum mechanics from conservation of probability, the optical theorem is widely applicable and, in quantum mechanics, {Anzeigestil Sigma _{Mathrm {tot} }} includes both elastic and inelastic scattering.

The generalized optical theorem, first derived by Werner Heisenberg, allows for arbitrary outgoing directions k': {displaystyle int f(mathbf {Hut {k}} ',mathbf {Hut {k}} '')f(mathbf {Hut {k}} '',mathbf {Hut {k}} )~dmathbf {Hut {k}} ''={frac {4Pi }{k}}Mathrm {Ich bin} ~f(mathbf {Hut {k}} ',mathbf {Hut {k}} ).} The original optical theorem is recovered by letting {Anzeigestil mathbf {Hut {k}} '=mathbf {Hut {k}} } .

Inhalt 1 Geschichte 2 Ableitung 3 Siehe auch 4 References History The optical theorem was originally developed independently by Wolfgang Sellmeier[2] and Lord Rayleigh in 1871.[3] Lord Rayleigh recognized the forward scattering amplitude in terms of the index of refraction as {displaystyle n=1+2pi {frac {Nf(0)}{k^{2}}}} (where N is the number density of scatterers), which he used in a study of the color and polarization of the sky.

The equation was later extended to quantum scattering theory by several individuals, and came to be known as the Bohr–Peierls–Placzek relation after a 1939 Papier. It was first referred to as the "optical theorem" in print in 1955 by Hans Bethe and Frederic de Hoffmann, after it had been known as a "well known theorem of optics" for some time.

Derivation The theorem can be derived rather directly from a treatment of a scalar wave. If a plane wave is incident along positive z axis on an object, then the wave scattering amplitude a great distance away from the scatterer is approximately given by {Anzeigestil psi (mathbf {r} )approx e^{ikz}+f(Theta ){frac {e^{ikr}}{r}}.} All higher terms, when squared, vanish more quickly than {displaystyle 1/r^{2}} , and so are negligible a great distance away. For large values of {Anzeigestil mit} and for small angles, a Taylor expansion gives us {displaystyle r={quadrat {x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}}approx z+{frac {x^{2}+y^{2}}{2z}}.} We would now like to use the fact that the intensity is proportional to the square of the amplitude {Anzeigestil psi } . Approximating {displaystyle 1/r} wie {displaystyle 1/z} , wir haben {Anzeigestil {Start{ausgerichtet}|psi |^{2}&approx left|e^{ikz}+{frac {f(Theta )}{z}}e^{ikz}e^{ik(x^{2}+y^{2})/2z}Rechts|^{2}\&=1+{frac {f(Theta )}{z}}e^{ik(x^{2}+y^{2})/2z}+{frac {f^{*}(Theta )}{z}}e^{-ik(x^{2}+y^{2})/2z}+{frac {|f(Theta )|^{2}}{z^{2}}}.Ende{ausgerichtet}}} If we drop the {displaystyle 1/z^{2}} term and use the fact that {displaystyle c+c^{*}=2operatorname {Re} {c}} , wir haben {Anzeigestil |psi |^{2}approx 1+2operatorname {Re} {links[{frac {f(Theta )}{z}}e^{ik(x^{2}+y^{2})/2z}Rechts]}.} Now suppose we integrate over a screen far away in the xy plane, which is small enough for the small-angle approximations to be appropriate, but large enough that we can integrate the intensity over {displaystyle -infty } zu {displaystyle infty } in x and y with negligible error. In optics, this is equivalent to summing over many fringes of the diffraction pattern. To further simplify matters, let's approximate {Anzeigestil f(Theta )= f(0)} . We obtain {displaystyle int |psi |^{2},dx,dyapprox A+2operatorname {Re} links[{frac {f(0)}{z}}int _{-unendlich }^{unendlich }e^{ikx^{2}/2z}dxint _{-unendlich }^{unendlich }e^{iky^{2}/2z}Rechts],} where A is the area of the surface integrated over. Although these are improper integrals, by suitable substitutions the exponentials can be transformed into complex Gaussians and the definite integrals evaluated resulting in: {Anzeigestil {Start{ausgerichtet}int |psi |^{2},da&=A+2operatorname {Re} links[{frac {f(0)}{z}},{frac {2pi z}{ik}}Rechts]\&=A-{frac {4Pi }{k}},Name des Bedieners {Ich bin} [f(0)].Ende{ausgerichtet}}} This is the probability of reaching the screen if none were scattered, lessened by an amount {Anzeigestil (4pi /k)Name des Bedieners {Ich bin} [f(0)]} , which is therefore the effective scattering cross section of the scatterer.

See also S-matrix References ^ "Radar Cross Section, Optical Theorem, Physical Optics Approx, Radiation by Line Sources" on YouTube ^ The original publication omits his first name, which however can be inferred from a few more publications contributed by him to the same journal. One web source says he was a former student of Franz Ernst Neumann. Andernfalls, little to nothing is known about Sellmeier. ^ Strutt, J. W. (1871). XV. On the light from the sky, its polarization and colour. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 41(271), 107-120. Roger G. Newton (1976). "Optical Theorem and Beyond". Am. J. Phys. 44 (7): 639–642. Bibcode:1976AmJPh..44..639N. doi:10.1119/1.10324. John David Jackson (1999). Classical Electrodynamics. Hamilton Printing Company. ISBN 0-471-30932-X. Kategorien: Scattering theoryScattering, absorption and radiative transfer (optics)Physics theorems

Wenn Sie andere ähnliche Artikel wissen möchten **Optical theorem** Sie können die Kategorie besuchen **absorption and radiative transfer (optics)**.

Hinterlasse eine Antwort