# Kaplansky's theorem on quadratic forms Kaplansky's theorem on quadratic forms In mathematics, Kaplansky's theorem on quadratic forms is a result on simultaneous representation of primes by quadratic forms. It was proved in 2003 by Irving Kaplansky. Contenu 1 Énoncé du théorème 2 Preuve 3 Exemples 4 Similar results 5 Notes Statement of the theorem Kaplansky's theorem states that a prime p congruent to 1 modulo 16 is representable by both or none of x2 + 32y2 and x2 + 64y2, whereas a prime p congruent to 9 modulo 16 is representable by exactly one of these quadratic forms.

This is remarkable since the primes represented by each of these forms individually are not describable by congruence conditions. Proof Kaplansky's proof uses the facts that 2 is a 4th power modulo p if and only if p is representable by x2 + 64y2, and that −4 is an 8th power modulo p if and only if p is representable by x2 + 32y2.

Examples The prime p = 17 est conforme à 1 modulo 16 and is representable by neither x2 + 32y2 nor x2 + 64y2. The prime p=113 is congruent to 1 modulo 16 and is representable by both x2 + 32y2 and x2+64y2 (puisque 113 = 92 + 32×12 and 113 = 72 + 64×12). The prime p = 41 est conforme à 9 modulo 16 and is representable by x2 + 32y2 (puisque 41 = 32 + 32×12), but not by x2 + 64y2. The prime p = 73 est conforme à 9 modulo 16 and is representable by x2 + 64y2 (puisque 73 = 32 + 64×12), but not by x2 + 32y2. Similar results Five results similar to Kaplansky's theorem are known: A prime p congruent to 1 modulo 20 is representable by both or none of x2 + 20y2 and x2 + 100y2, whereas a prime p congruent to 9 modulo 20 is representable by exactly one of these quadratic forms. A prime p congruent to 1, 16 ou 22 modulo 39 is representable by both or none of x2 + xy + 10y2 and x2 + xy + 127y2, whereas a prime p congruent to 4, 10 ou 25 modulo 39 is representable by exactly one of these quadratic forms. A prime p congruent to 1, 16, 26, 31 ou 36 modulo 55 is representable by both or none of x2 + xy + 14y2 and x2 + xy + 69y2, whereas a prime p congruent to 4, 9, 14, 34 ou 49 modulo 55 is representable by exactly one of these quadratic forms. A prime p congruent to 1, 65 ou 81 modulo 112 is representable by both or none of x2 + 14y2 and x2 + 448y2, whereas a prime p congruent to 9, 25 ou 57 modulo 112 is representable by exactly one of these quadratic forms. A prime p congruent to 1 ou 169 modulo 240 is representable by both or none of x2 + 150y2 and x2 + 960y2, whereas a prime p congruent to 49 ou 121 modulo 240 is representable by exactly one of these quadratic forms.

It is conjectured that there are no other similar results involving definite forms.

Notes ^ Kaplansky, Irving (2003), "The forms x + 32y2 and x + 64y^2 [sic]", Actes de l'American Mathematical Society, 131 (7): 2299–2300 (electronic), est ce que je:10.1090/S0002-9939-03-07022-9, M 1963780. ^ Cox, David A. (1989), Primes of the form x2 + ny2, New York: John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 0-471-50654-0, M 1028322. ^ Brink, David (2009), "Five peculiar theorems on simultaneous representation of primes by quadratic forms", Journal de la théorie des nombres, 129 (2): 464–468, est ce que je:10.1016/j.jnt.2008.04.007, M 2473893. Catégories: Theorems in number theoryQuadratic forms

Si vous voulez connaître d'autres articles similaires à Kaplansky's theorem on quadratic forms vous pouvez visiter la catégorie Quadratic forms.

Monter

Nous utilisons nos propres cookies et ceux de tiers pour améliorer l'expérience utilisateur Plus d'informations