Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch theorem

Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch theorem   (Redirected from Grothendieck–Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem) Jump to navigation Jump to search Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch theorem Grothendieck's comment on the Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch theorem Field Algebraic geometry First proof by Alexander Grothendieck First proof in 1957 Generalizations Atiyah–Singer index theorem Consequences Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem Riemann–Roch theorem for surfaces Riemann–Roch theorem In mathematics, specifically in algebraic geometry, the Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch theorem is a far-reaching result on coherent cohomology. It is a generalisation of the Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem, about complex manifolds, which is itself a generalisation of the classical Riemann–Roch theorem for line bundles on compact Riemann surfaces.

Riemann–Roch type theorems relate Euler characteristics of the cohomology of a vector bundle with their topological degrees, or more generally their characteristic classes in (co)homology or algebraic analogues thereof. The classical Riemann–Roch theorem does this for curves and line bundles, whereas the Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem generalises this to vector bundles over manifolds. The Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch theorem sets both theorems in a relative situation of a morphism between two manifolds (or more general schemes) and changes the theorem from a statement about a single bundle, to one applying to chain complexes of sheaves.

The theorem has been very influential, not least for the development of the Atiyah–Singer index theorem. Conversely, complex analytic analogues of the Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch theorem can be proved using the index theorem for families. Alexander Grothendieck gave a first proof in a 1957 manuscript, later published.[1] Armand Borel and Jean-Pierre Serre wrote up and published Grothendieck's proof in 1958.[2] Later, Grothendieck and his collaborators simplified and generalized the proof.[3] Contents 1 Formulation 2 Generalising and specialising 3 Examples 3.1 Vector bundles on a curve 3.2 Smooth proper maps 3.2.1 Moduli of curves 3.3 Closed embedding 4 Applications 4.1 Quasi-projectivity of moduli spaces 5 History 6 See also 7 Notes 8 References 9 External links Formulation Let X be a smooth quasi-projective scheme over a field. Under these assumptions, the Grothendieck group {displaystyle K_{0}(X)} of bounded complexes of coherent sheaves is canonically isomorphic to the Grothendieck group of bounded complexes of finite-rank vector bundles. Using this isomorphism, consider the Chern character (a rational combination of Chern classes) as a functorial transformation: {displaystyle mathrm {ch} colon K_{0}(X)to A(X,mathbb {Q} ),} where {displaystyle A_{d}(X,mathbb {Q} )} is the Chow group of cycles on X of dimension d modulo rational equivalence, tensored with the rational numbers. In case X is defined over the complex numbers, the latter group maps to the topological cohomology group: {displaystyle H^{2dim(X)-2d}(X,mathbb {Q} ).} Now consider a proper morphism {displaystyle fcolon Xto Y} between smooth quasi-projective schemes and a bounded complex of sheaves {displaystyle {{mathcal {F}}^{bullet }}} on {displaystyle X.} The Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch theorem relates the pushforward map {displaystyle f_{!}=sum (-1)^{i}R^{i}f_{*}colon K_{0}(X)to K_{0}(Y)} (alternating sum of higher direct images) and the pushforward {displaystyle f_{*}colon A(X)to A(Y),} by the formula {displaystyle mathrm {ch} (f_{!}{mathcal {F}}^{bullet })mathrm {td} (Y)=f_{*}(mathrm {ch} ({mathcal {F}}^{bullet })mathrm {td} (X)).} Here {displaystyle mathrm {td} (X)} is the Todd genus of (the tangent bundle of) X. Thus the theorem gives a precise measure for the lack of commutativity of taking the push forwards in the above senses and the Chern character and shows that the needed correction factors depend on X and Y only. In fact, since the Todd genus is functorial and multiplicative in exact sequences, we can rewrite the Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch formula as {displaystyle mathrm {ch} (f_{!}{mathcal {F}}^{bullet })=f_{*}(mathrm {ch} ({mathcal {F}}^{bullet })mathrm {td} (T_{f})),} where {displaystyle T_{f}} is the relative tangent sheaf of f, defined as the element {displaystyle TX-f^{*}(TY)} in {displaystyle K_{0}(X)} . For example, when f is a smooth morphism, {displaystyle T_{f}} is simply a vector bundle, known as the tangent bundle along the fibers of f.

Using A1-homotopy theory, the Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch theorem has been extended by Navarro & Navarro (2017) to the situation where f is a proper map between two smooth schemes.

Generalising and specialising Generalisations of the theorem can be made to the non-smooth case by considering an appropriate generalisation of the combination {displaystyle mathrm {ch} (-)mathrm {td} (X)} and to the non-proper case by considering cohomology with compact support.

The arithmetic Riemann–Roch theorem extends the Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch theorem to arithmetic schemes.

The Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem is (essentially) the special case where Y is a point and the field is the field of complex numbers.

A version of Riemann–Roch theorem for oriented cohomology theories was proven by Ivan Panin and Alexander Smirnov.[4] It is concerned with multiplicative operations between algebraic oriented cohomology theories (such as algebraic cobordism). The Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch is a particular case of this result, and the Chern character comes up naturally in this setting.[5] Examples Vector bundles on a curve A vector bundle {displaystyle Eto C} of rank {displaystyle n} and degree {displaystyle d} (defined as the degree of its determinant; or equivalently the degree of its first Chern class) on a smooth projective curve over a field {displaystyle k} has a formula similar to Riemann–Roch for line bundles. If we take {displaystyle X=C} and {displaystyle Y={*}} a point then the Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch formula can be read as {displaystyle {begin{aligned}mathrm {ch} (f_{!}{mathcal {F}}^{bullet })&=h^{0}(C,E)-h^{1}(C,E)\f_{*}(mathrm {ch} (E)mathrm {td} (X))&=f_{*}((n+c_{1}(E))(1+(1/2)c_{1}(T_{C})))\&=f_{*}(n+c_{1}(E)+(n/2)c_{1}(T_{C}))\&=f_{*}(c_{1}(E)+(n/2)c_{1}(T_{C}))\&=d+n(1-g)end{aligned}}} hence {displaystyle chi (C,E)=d+n(1-g).} [6] This formula also holds for coherent sheaves of rank {displaystyle n} and degree {displaystyle d} .

Smooth proper maps One of the advantages of the Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch formula is it can be interpreted as a relative version of the Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch formula. For example, a smooth morphism {displaystyle fcolon Xto Y} has fibers which are all equi-dimensional (and isomorphic as topological spaces when base changing to {displaystyle mathbb {C} } ). This fact is useful in moduli-theory when considering a moduli space {displaystyle {mathcal {M}}} parameterizing smooth proper spaces. For example, David Mumford used this formula to deduce relationships of the Chow ring on the moduli space of algebraic curves.[7] Moduli of curves For the moduli stack of genus {displaystyle g} curves (and no marked points) {displaystyle {overline {mathcal {M}}}_{g}} there is a universal curve {displaystyle pi colon {overline {mathcal {C}}}_{g}to {overline {mathcal {M}}}_{g}} where {displaystyle {overline {mathcal {C}}}_{g}={overline {mathcal {M}}}_{g,1}} (is the moduli stack of curves of genus {displaystyle g} and one marked point. Then, he defines the tautological classes {displaystyle {begin{aligned}K_{{overline {mathcal {C}}}_{g}/{overline {mathcal {M}}}_{g}}&=c_{1}(omega _{{overline {mathcal {C}}}_{g}/{overline {mathcal {M}}}_{g}})\kappa _{l}&=pi _{*}(K_{{overline {mathcal {C}}}_{g}/{overline {mathcal {M}}}_{g}}^{l+1})\mathbb {E} &=pi _{*}(omega _{{overline {mathcal {C}}}_{g}/{overline {mathcal {M}}}_{g}})\lambda _{l}&=c_{l}(mathbb {E} )end{aligned}}} where {displaystyle 1leq lleq g} and {displaystyle omega _{{overline {mathcal {C}}}_{g}/{overline {mathcal {M}}}_{g}}} is the relative dualizing sheaf. Note the fiber of {displaystyle omega _{{overline {mathcal {C}}}_{g}/{overline {mathcal {M}}}_{g}}} over a point {displaystyle [C]in {overline {mathcal {M}}}_{g}} this is the dualizing sheaf {displaystyle omega _{C}} . He was able to find relations between the {displaystyle lambda _{i}} and {displaystyle kappa _{i}} describing the {displaystyle lambda _{i}} in terms of a sum of {displaystyle kappa _{i}} [7] (corollary 6.2) on the chow ring {displaystyle A^{*}({mathcal {M}}_{g})} of the smooth locus using Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch. Because {displaystyle {overline {mathcal {M}}}_{g}} is a smooth Deligne–Mumford stack, he considered a covering by a scheme {displaystyle {tilde {mathcal {M}}}_{g}to {overline {mathcal {M}}}_{g}} which presents {displaystyle {overline {mathcal {M}}}_{g}=[{tilde {mathcal {M}}}_{g}/G]} for some finite group {displaystyle G} . He uses Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch on {displaystyle omega _{{tilde {mathcal {C}}}_{g}/{tilde {mathcal {M}}}_{g}}} to get {displaystyle mathrm {ch} (pi _{!}(omega _{{tilde {mathcal {C}}}/{tilde {mathcal {M}}}}))=pi _{*}(mathrm {ch} (omega _{{tilde {mathcal {C}}}/{tilde {mathcal {M}}}})mathrm {Td} ^{vee }(Omega _{{tilde {mathcal {C}}}/{tilde {mathcal {M}}}}^{1}))} Because {displaystyle mathbf {R} ^{1}pi _{!}({omega _{{tilde {mathcal {C}}}_{g}/{tilde {mathcal {M}}}_{g}}})cong {mathcal {O}}_{tilde {M}},} this gives the formula {displaystyle mathrm {ch} (mathbb {E} )=1+pi _{*}({text{ch}}(omega _{{tilde {mathcal {C}}}/{tilde {mathcal {M}}}}){text{Td}}^{vee }(Omega _{{tilde {mathcal {C}}}/{tilde {mathcal {M}}}}^{1})).} The computation of {displaystyle mathrm {ch} (mathbb {E} )} can then be reduced even further. In even dimensions {displaystyle 2k} , {displaystyle {text{ch}}(mathbb {E} )_{2k}=0.} Also, on dimension 1, {displaystyle lambda _{1}=c_{1}(mathbb {E} )={frac {1}{12}}(kappa _{1}+delta ),} where {displaystyle delta } is a class on the boundary. In the case {displaystyle g=2} and on the smooth locus {displaystyle {mathcal {M}}_{g}} there are the relations {displaystyle {begin{aligned}lambda _{1}&={frac {1}{12}}kappa _{1}\lambda _{2}&={frac {lambda _{1}^{2}}{2}}={frac {kappa _{1}^{2}}{288}}end{aligned}}} which can be deduced by analyzing the Chern character of {displaystyle mathbb {E} } .

Closed embedding Closed embeddings {displaystyle fcolon Yto X} have a description using the Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch formula as well, showing another non-trivial case where the formula holds.[8] For a smooth variety {displaystyle X} of dimension {displaystyle n} and a subvariety {displaystyle Y} of codimension {displaystyle k} , there is the formula {displaystyle c_{k}({mathcal {O}}_{Y})=(-1)^{k-1}(k-1)![Y]} Using the short exact sequence {displaystyle 0to {mathcal {I}}_{Y}to {mathcal {O}}_{X}to {mathcal {O}}_{Y}to 0} , there is the formula {displaystyle c_{k}({mathcal {I}}_{Y})=(-1)^{k}(k-1)![Y]} for the ideal sheaf since {displaystyle 1=c({mathcal {O}}_{X})=c({mathcal {O}}_{Y})c({mathcal {I}}_{Y})} .

Applications Quasi-projectivity of moduli spaces Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch can be used in proving that a coarse moduli space {displaystyle M} , such as the moduli space of pointed algebraic curves {displaystyle M_{g,n}} , admits an embedding into a projective space, hence is a quasi-projective variety. This can be accomplished by looking at canonically associated sheaves on {displaystyle M} and studying the degree of associated line bundles. For instance, {displaystyle M_{g,n}} [9] has the family of curves {displaystyle pi colon C_{g,n}to M_{g,n}} with sections {displaystyle s_{i}colon M_{g,n}to C_{g,n}} corresponding to the marked points. Since each fiber has the canonical bundle {displaystyle omega _{C}} , there are the associated line bundles {displaystyle Lambda _{g,n}(pi )=det(mathbf {R} pi _{*}(omega _{C_{g,n}/M_{g,n}}))} and {displaystyle chi _{g,n}^{(i)}=s_{i}^{*}(omega _{C_{g,n}/M_{g,n}}).} It turns out that {displaystyle Lambda _{g,n}(pi )otimes left(bigotimes _{i=1}^{n}chi _{g,n}^{(i)}right)} is an ample line bundle[9]pg 209, hence the coarse moduli space {displaystyle M_{g,n}} is quasi-projective.

History Alexander Grothendieck's version of the Riemann–Roch theorem was originally conveyed in a letter to Jean-Pierre Serre around 1956–1957. It was made public at the initial Bonn Arbeitstagung, in 1957. Serre and Armand Borel subsequently organized a seminar at Princeton University to understand it. The final published paper was in effect the Borel–Serre exposition.

The significance of Grothendieck's approach rests on several points. First, Grothendieck changed the statement itself: the theorem was, at the time, understood to be a theorem about a variety, whereas Grothendieck saw it as a theorem about a morphism between varieties. By finding the right generalization, the proof became simpler while the conclusion became more general. In short, Grothendieck applied a strong categorical approach to a hard piece of analysis. Moreover, Grothendieck introduced K-groups, as discussed above, which paved the way for algebraic K-theory.

See also Kawasaki's Riemann–Roch formula Notes ^ A. Grothendieck. Classes de faisceaux et théorème de Riemann–Roch (1957). Published in SGA 6, Springer-Verlag (1971), 20-71. ^ A. Borel and J.-P. Serre. Bull. Soc. Math. France 86 (1958), 97-136. ^ SGA 6, Springer-Verlag (1971). ^ Panin, Ivan; Smirnov, Alexander (2002). "Push-forwards in oriented cohomology theories of algebraic varieties". ^ Morel, Fabien; Levine, Marc, Algebraic cobordism (PDF), Springer, see 4.2.10 and 4.2.11 ^ Morrison; Harris. Moduli of curves. p. 154. ^ Jump up to: a b Mumford, David (1983). "Towards an Enumerative Geometry of the Moduli Space of Curves". Arithmetic and Geometry: 271–328. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-9286-7_12. ISBN 978-0-8176-3133-8. ^ Fulton. Intersection Theory. p. 297. ^ Jump up to: a b Knudsen, Finn F. (1983-12-01). "The projectivity of the moduli space of stable curves, III: The line bundles on {displaystyle M_{g,n}} , and a proof of the projectivity of {displaystyle {bar {M}}_{g,n}} in characteristic 0". Mathematica Scandinavica. 52: 200–212. doi:10.7146/math.scand.a-12002. ISSN 1903-1807. References Berthelot, Pierre (1971). Alexandre Grothendieck; Luc Illusie (eds.). Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique du Bois Marie - 1966-67 - Théorie des intersections et théorème de Riemann-Roch - (SGA 6) (Lecture notes in mathematics 225). Lecture Notes in Mathematics (in French). Vol. 225. Berlin; New York: Springer-Verlag. xii+700. doi:10.1007/BFb0066283. ISBN 978-3-540-05647-8. Borel, Armand; Serre, Jean-Pierre (1958), "Le théorème de Riemann–Roch", Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France (in French), 86: 97–136, doi:10.24033/bsmf.1500, ISSN 0037-9484, MR 0116022 Fulton, William (1998), Intersection theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge., vol. 2 (2nd ed.), Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 3-540-62046-X, MR 1644323, Zbl 0885.14002 Navarro, Alberto; Navarro, José (2017), On the Riemann-Roch formula without projective hypothesis, arXiv:1705.10769, Bibcode:2017arXiv170510769N Panin, Ivan; Smirnov, Alexander (2000). "Push-forwards in oriented cohomology theories of algebraic varieties". External links The Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch Theorem The thread "Applications of Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch?" on MathOverflow. The thread "how does one understand GRR? (Grothendieck Riemann Roch)" on MathOverflow. The thread "Chern class of ideal sheaf" on Stack Exchange. hide vte Bernhard Riemann Cauchy–Riemann equationsGeneralized Riemann hypothesisGrand Riemann hypothesisGrothendieck–Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theoremHirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theoremLocal zeta functionMeasurable Riemann mapping theoremRiemannRiemann Xi functionRiemann curvature tensorRiemann hypothesisRiemann integralRiemann invariantRiemann mapping theoremRiemann formRiemann problemRiemann series theoremRiemann solverRiemann sphereRiemann sumRiemann surfaceRiemann zeta functionRiemann's differential equationRiemann's minimal surfaceRiemannian circleRiemannian connection on a surfaceRiemannian geometryRiemann–Hilbert correspondenceRiemann–Hilbert problemsRiemann–Lebesgue lemmaRiemann–Liouville integralRiemann–Roch theoremRiemann–Roch theorem or smooth manifoldsRiemann–Siegel formulaRiemann–Siegel theta functionRiemann–Silberstein vectorRiemann–Stieltjes integralRiemann–von Mangoldt formula Category Categories: Topological methods of algebraic geometryTheorems in algebraic geometryBernhard Riemann

Si quieres conocer otros artículos parecidos a Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch theorem puedes visitar la categoría Bernhard Riemann.

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada.

Subir

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar la experiencia de usuario Más información