# Beatty sequence

Rayleigh's theorem, named after Lord Rayleigh, states that the complement of a Beatty sequence, consisting of the positive integers that are not in the sequence, is itself a Beatty sequence generated by a different irrational number.

Beatty sequences can also be used to generate Sturmian words.

Contents 1 Definition 2 Examples 3 History 4 Rayleigh theorem 4.1 First proof 4.2 Second proof 5 Properties 5.1 Relation with Sturmian sequences 6 Generalizations 7 References 8 Further reading 9 External links Definition A positive irrational number {displaystyle r} generates the Beatty sequence {displaystyle {mathcal {B}}_{r}=lfloor rrfloor ,lfloor 2rrfloor ,lfloor 3rrfloor ,ldots } If {displaystyle r>1,,} then {displaystyle s=r/(r-1)} is also a positive irrational number. These two numbers naturally satisfy the equation {displaystyle 1/r+1/s=1} . The two Beatty sequences they generate, {displaystyle {mathcal {B}}_{r}=(lfloor nrrfloor )_{ngeq 1}} and {displaystyle {mathcal {B}}_{s}=(lfloor nsrfloor )_{ngeq 1}} , form a pair of complementary Beatty sequences. Here, "complementary" means that every positive integer belongs to exactly one of these two sequences.

Examples When r is the golden mean, we have s = r + 1. In this case, the sequence {displaystyle (lfloor nrrfloor )} , known as the lower Wythoff sequence, is 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, 17, 19, 21, 22, 24, 25, 27, 29, ... (sequence A000201 in the OEIS).

and the complementary sequence {displaystyle (lfloor nsrfloor )} , the upper Wythoff sequence, is 2, 5, 7, 10, 13, 15, 18, 20, 23, 26, 28, 31, 34, 36, 39, 41, 44, 47, ... (sequence A001950 in the OEIS).

These sequences define the optimal strategy for Wythoff's game, and are used in the definition of the Wythoff array As another example, for r = √2, we have s = 2 + √2. In this case, the sequences are 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 21, 22, 24, ... (sequence A001951 in the OEIS) and 3, 6, 10, 13, 17, 20, 23, 27, 30, 34, 37, 40, 44, 47, 51, 54, 58, ... (sequence A001952 in the OEIS).

And for r = π and s = π/(π − 1) the sequences are 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37, 40, 43, 47, 50, 53, ... (sequence A022844 in the OEIS) and 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 26, ... (sequence A054386 in the OEIS).

Any number in the first sequence is absent in the second, and vice versa.

History Beatty sequences got their name from the problem posed in the American Mathematical Monthly by Samuel Beatty in 1926. It is probably one of the most often cited problems ever posed in the Monthly. However, even earlier, in 1894 such sequences were briefly mentioned by John W. Strutt (3rd Baron Rayleigh) in the second edition of his book The Theory of Sound. Rayleigh theorem The Rayleigh theorem (also known as Beatty's theorem) states that given an irrational number {displaystyle r>1,,} there exists {displaystyle s>1} so that the Beatty sequences {displaystyle {mathcal {B}}_{r}} and {displaystyle {mathcal {B}}_{s}} partition the set of positive integers: each positive integer belongs to exactly one of the two sequences. First proof Given {displaystyle r>1,,} let {displaystyle s=r/(r-1)} . We must show that every positive integer lies in one and only one of the two sequences {displaystyle {mathcal {B}}_{r}} and {displaystyle {mathcal {B}}_{s}} . We shall do so by considering the ordinal positions occupied by all the fractions {displaystyle j/r} and {displaystyle k/s} when they are jointly listed in nondecreasing order for positive integers j and k.

To see that no two of the numbers can occupy the same position (as a single number), suppose to the contrary that {displaystyle j/r=k/s} for some j and k. Then {displaystyle r/s} = {displaystyle j/k} , a rational number, but also, {displaystyle r/s=r(1-1/r)=r-1,} not a rational number. Therefore, no two of the numbers occupy the same position.

For any {displaystyle j/r} , there are {displaystyle j} positive integers {displaystyle i} such that {displaystyle i/rleq j/r} and {displaystyle lfloor js/rrfloor } positive integers {displaystyle k} such that {displaystyle k/sleq j/r} , so that the position of {displaystyle j/r} in the list is {displaystyle j+lfloor js/rrfloor } . The equation {displaystyle 1/r+1/s=1} implies {displaystyle j+lfloor js/rrfloor =j+lfloor j(s-1)rfloor =lfloor jsrfloor .} Likewise, the position of {displaystyle k/s} in the list is {displaystyle lfloor krrfloor } .

Conclusion: every positive integer (that is, every position in the list) is of the form {displaystyle lfloor nrrfloor }  or of the form {displaystyle lfloor nsrfloor } , but not both. The converse statement is also true: if p and q are two real numbers such that every positive integer occurs precisely once in the above list, then p and q are irrational and the sum of their reciprocals is 1.

Second proof Collisions: Suppose that, contrary to the theorem, there are integers j > 0 and k and m such that {displaystyle j=leftlfloor {kcdot r}rightrfloor =leftlfloor {mcdot s}rightrfloor ,.} This is equivalent to the inequalities {displaystyle jleq kcdot r 0 and k and m such that {displaystyle kcdot r

Si quieres conocer otros artículos parecidos a Beatty sequence puedes visitar la categoría Diophantine approximation.

Subir

Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar la experiencia de usuario Más información