# Apéry's theorem

In matematica, Apéry's theorem is a result in number theory that states the Apéry's constant ζ(3) is irrational. Questo è, il numero

# Apéry's theorem

Jump to navigation

Jump to search

In matematica, **Apéry's theorem** is a result in teoria dei numeri that states the Apéry's constant ζ(3) è irrational. Questo è, il numero

- $$displaystyle zeta (3)=somma _{n=1}^{infty }{frac {1}{n^{3}}}={frac {1}{1^{3}}}+{frac {1}{2^{3}}}+{frac {1}{3^{3}}}+ldots =1.2020569ldots }

cannot be written as a fraction *p*/*q* dove *p* e *q* sono integers. Il teorema prende il nome Roger Apéry.

The special values of the Riemann zeta function a anche integers 2*n* (*n* > 0) can be shown in terms of Bernoulli numbers to be irrational, while it remains open whether the function's values are in general rational or not at the odd integers 2*n* + 1 (*n* > 1) (though they are conjectured to be irrational).

## Storia[]

Euler proved that if *n* is a positive integer then

- $$ldots ={frac {p}{q}}pi ^{2n}}

for some rational number *p*/*q*. In particolare, writing the infinite series on the left as ζ(2*n*) he showed

- $$displaystyle zeta (2n)=(-1)^{n+1}{frac {B_{2n}(2pi )^{2n}}{2(2n)!}}}

dove il *B*_{n} are the rational Bernoulli numbers. Once it was proved that π^{ n} is always irrational this showed that ζ(2*n*) is irrational for all positive integers *n*.

No such representation in terms of π is known for the so-called zeta constants for odd arguments, the values ζ(2*n* + 1) for positive integers *n*. It has been conjectured that the ratios of these quantities

- $$

sono transcendental for every integer *n* ≥ 1.^{[1]}

Because of this, no proof could be found to show that the zeta constants with odd arguments were irrational, even though they were (and still are) all believed to be transcendental. Tuttavia, in June 1978, Roger Apéry gave a talk titled "Sur l'irrationalité de ζ(3)." During the course of the talk he outlined proofs that ζ(3) and ζ(2) were irrational, the latter using methods simplified from those used to tackle the former rather than relying on the expression in terms of π. Due to the wholly unexpected nature of the proof and Apéry's blasé and very sketchy approach to the subject, many of the mathematicians in the audience dismissed the proof as flawed. Tuttavia Henri Cohen, Hendrik Lenstra, e Alfred van der Poorten suspected Apéry was on to something and set out to confirm his proof. Two months later they finished verification of Apéry's proof, and on August 18 Cohen delivered a lecture giving full details of the proof. After the lecture Apéry himself took to the podium to explain the source of some of his ideas.^{[2]}

## Apéry's proof[]

Apéry's original proof^{[3]}^{[4]} was based on the well known irrationality criterion from Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet, which states that a number ξ is irrational if there are infinitely many coprime integers *p* e *q* tale che

- $$

for some fixed *c*, δ > 0.

The starting point for Apéry was the series representation of ζ(3) come

- $$displaystyle zeta (3)={frac {5}{2}}somma _{n=1}^{infty }{frac {(-1)^{n-1}}{n^{3}{alcuni di quelli {2n}{n}}}}.}

In parole povere, Apéry then defined a sequenza *c*_{n,K} which converges to ζ(3) about as fast as the above series, specifically

- $$

He then defined two more sequences *un _{n}* e

*b*Quello, roughly, have the quotient

_{n}*c*

_{n,K}.

These sequences were

- $$n+k}{K}}^{2}}

e

- $$n+k}{K}}^{2}.}

La sequenza *un*_{n} /*b*_{n} converges to ζ(3) fast enough to apply the criterion, but unfortunately *un*_{n} is not an integer after *n* = 2.

Tuttavia, Apéry showed that even after multiplying *un*_{n} e *b*_{n} by a suitable integer to cure this problem the convergence was still fast enough to guarantee irrationality.

## Later proofs[]

Within a year of Apéry's result an alternative proof was found by Frits Beukers,^{[5]} who replaced Apéry's series with integrals involving the shifted Legendre polynomials

. Using a representation that would later be generalized to Hadjicostas's formula, Beukers showed that

- $$dxdy={frac {UN_{n}+B_{n}zeta (3)}{nome operatore {mcm} sinistra[1,ldot ,giusto]^{3}}}}

for some integers *UN _{n}* e

*B*(sequenze OEIS: A171484 e OEIS: A171485). Using partial integration and the assumption that ζ(3) was rational and equal to

_{n}*un*/

*b*, Beukers eventually derived the inequality

- $$leq 4left({frac {4}{5}}Giusto)^{n}}

il quale è un contraddizione since the right-most expression tends to zero as n → ∞, and so must eventually fall below 1/*b*.

A more recent proof by Wadim Zudilin is more reminiscent of Apéry's original proof,^{[6]} and also has similarities to a fourth proof by Yuri Nesterenko.^{[7]} These later proofs again derive a contradiction from the assumption that ζ(3) is rational by constructing sequences that tend to zero but are bounded below by some positive constant.

They are somewhat less transparent than the earlier proofs, since they rely upon hypergeometric series.

## Higher zeta constants[]

Apéry and Beukers could simplify their proofs to work on ζ(2) as well thanks to the series representation

- $$displaystyle zeta (2)=3sum _{n=1}^{infty }{frac {1}{n^{2}{alcuni di quelli {2n}{n}}}}.}

Due to the success of Apéry's method a search was undertaken for a number ξ_{5} with the property that

- $$displaystyle zeta (5)=xi _{5}somma _{n=1}^{infty }{frac {(-1)^{n-1}}{n^{5}{alcuni di quelli {2n}{n}}}}.}

If such a ξ_{5} were found then the methods used to prove Apéry's theorem would be expected to work on a proof that ζ(5) is irrational.

Purtroppo, extensive computer searching^{[8]} has failed to find such a constant, and in fact it is now known that if ξ_{5} exists and if it is an algebraic number of degree at most 25, then the coefficients in its minimal polynomial must be enormous, almeno 10^{383}, so extending Apéry's proof to work on the higher odd zeta constants does not seem likely to work.

Despite this, many mathematicians working in this area expect a breakthrough sometime soon.^{[quando?]}^{[9]} Infatti, recent work by Wadim Zudilin and Tanguy Rivoal has shown that infinitely many of the numbers ζ(2*n* + 1) must be irrational,^{[10]} and even that at least one of the numbers ζ(5), ζ(7), ζ(9), and ζ(11) must be irrational.^{[11]} Their work uses linear forms in values of the zeta function and estimates upon them to bound the dimension of a vector space spanned by values of the zeta function at odd integers. Hopes that Zudilin could cut his list further to just one number did not materialise, but work on this problem is still an active area of research. Higher zeta constants have application to physics: they describe correlation functions in quantum spin chains.^{[12]}

## Riferimenti[]

**^**Kohnen, Winfried (1989). "Transcendence conjectures about periods of modular forms and rational structures on spaces of modular forms".

*Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Matematica. Sci*.**99**(3): 231–233. doi:10.1007/BF02864395. S2CID 121346325.**^**UN. van der Poorten (1979). "A proof that Euler missed..." (PDF).*L'Intelligence Matematica*.**1**(4): 195–203. doi:10.1007/BF03028234. S2CID 121589323.**^**Apéry, R. (1979). "Irrationalité de ζ(2) et ζ(3)".*Asterisco*.**61**: 11–13.**^**Apéry, R. (1981), "Interpolation de fractions continues et irrationalité de certaines constantes",*Bulletin de la section des sciences du C.T.H.S III*, pp. 37–53**^**F. Beukers (1979). "A note on the irrationality of ζ(2) and ζ(3)".*Bollettino della London Mathematical Society*.**11**(3): 268–272. doi:10.1112/blms/11.3.268.**^**Zudilin, w. (2002). "An Elementary Proof of Apéry's Theorem". arXiv:math/0202159.**^**Ю. A. Нестеренко (1996). Некоторые замечания о ζ(3).*Matem. Заметки*(in russo).**59**(6): 865–880. doi:10.4213/mzm1785. English translation: Yu. V. Nesterenko (1996). "A Few Remarks on ζ(3)".*Matematica. Appunti*.**59**(6): 625–636. doi:10.1007/BF02307212. S2CID 117487836.**^**D. H. Bailey, J. Borwein, N. Calkin, R. Girgensohn, R. Luca, e V. Moll,*Experimental Mathematics in Action*, 2007.**^**Jorn Steuding (2005).*Diophantine Analysis*. Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC. p. 280. ISBN 978-1-58488-482-8.**^**Rivoal, T. (2000). "La fonction zeta de Riemann prend une infinité de valeurs irrationnelles aux entiers impairs".*Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Série I*.**331**: 267–270. arXiv:math/0008051. Bibcode:2000CRASM.331..267R. doi:10.1016/S0764-4442(00)01624-4. S2CID 119678120.**^**w. Zudilin (2001). "One of the numbers ζ(5), ζ(7), ζ(9), ζ(11) is irrational".*Russ. Matematica. Surv*.**56**(4): 774–776. Bibcode:2001RuMaS..56..774Z. doi:10.1070/RM2001v056n04ABEH000427.**^**H. e. fischi; V. e. Korepin; Y. Nishiyama; M. Shiroishi (2002). "Quantum Correlations and Number Theory".*Giornale di fisica A*.**35**(20): 4443–4452. arXiv:cond-mat/0202346. Bibcode:2002JPhA...35.4443B. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/35/20/305. S2CID 119143600.

## link esterno[]

- Huylebrouck, Dirk (2001). "Similarities in Irrationality Proofs for π, ln2, ζ(2), and ζ(3)" (PDF).
*Amer. Matematica. Mensile*.**108**(3): 222–231. doi:10.2307/2695383. JSTOR 2695383.

Se vuoi conoscere altri articoli simili a **Apéry's theorem** puoi visitare la categoria **Teoremi di teoria dei numeri**.

lascia un commento